2005 · Conference paper
Strategic Hospital Management and Its Toolkit: Methods for Economic Performance Analysis
Conceptual comparative review of models, approaches and tools for economic and diagnostic analysis in hospital management
How to cite this publication
Georgieva, M. (2005). Strategic hospital management and its toolkit: Methods for economic performance analysis. In Is Planning in Crisis? Jubilee Almanac, Vol. 2 (pp. 182–189). D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov.
Extended Structured Summary
Introduction
Hospitals carry exceptional social responsibility because their activities directly concern health and human life. For that reason, management cannot be reduced to accounting reports or isolated financial indicators. Strategic hospital management requires systematic knowledge of organisational condition, resources, processes, outcomes and deviations from objectives.
The paper positions diagnostic and economic analysis as essential elements of the strategic-management toolkit and examines how established organisational assessment approaches can be adapted to healthcare institutions.
Aim
To systematise and compare widely used models, approaches and assessment questionnaires and evaluate their applicability to the strategic management of Bulgarian hospitals.
Material and methods
The study is conceptual and comparative. Models, methods and questionnaires for organisational performance assessment are analysed with attention to their strengths, weaknesses and indicator coverage.
The comparison is consolidated in a synoptic table designed to identify tools with the strongest potential for contemporary hospital management.
Diagnostic analysis as a strategic-management tool
Diagnostic analysis extends beyond retrospective reporting. It helps identify the causes underlying organisational conditions, detect weaknesses and improvement potential, and inform management action.
Within strategic management, analysis should support both goal formulation and subsequent assessment of whether chosen actions produce the intended outcomes.
Why a single indicator is insufficient
Complex hospital management cannot rely on a single financial or operational measure. Different approaches capture different dimensions of organisational performance, including resources, processes, results, quality, customers, employees, strategy and development capacity.
The value of a framework therefore depends less on the number of indicators than on whether it provides a balanced picture and supports concrete management decisions.
Strengths and weaknesses of analytical methods
No universal instrument is automatically suitable for every hospital. Frameworks differ in philosophy, information requirements, complexity, emphasis on financial versus non-financial results, and ability to connect operational indicators with strategic objectives.
Hospital managers therefore need critical selection and adaptation rather than mechanical transfer of corporate models into healthcare.
EFQM and continuous improvement
The paper highlights the logic of the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM), in which systematic assessment and self-evaluation can create strategic advantages by improving organisational understanding, identifying areas for improvement and directing management effort toward sustainable results.
Performance assessment is thus framed not as a one-time control activity but as part of a continuous organisational-improvement cycle.
Criteria for selecting an analytical tool
- alignment with hospital strategic objectives;
- ability to combine financial and non-financial indicators;
- coverage of multiple organisational dimensions rather than a single outcome;
- availability and reliability of required data;
- clarity and practical usability for the management team;
- ability to translate analytical findings into concrete improvement actions.
Main contributions
- places economic and diagnostic analysis within strategic hospital management;
- systematises models, approaches and questionnaires through comparative review;
- examines both strengths and limitations of analytical tools;
- argues for multidimensional rather than single-indicator assessment;
- supports critical adaptation of corporate frameworks to hospital-specific conditions;
- provides an early methodological foundation for the later research programme on comprehensive hospital diagnostic analysis.
Conclusions
Selecting an analytical method is not merely a technical decision; it is part of strategic management. The chosen tool should help the hospital understand its condition, connect resources and processes with results, and identify actionable opportunities for improvement.
Regardless of the specific framework, systematic performance measurement and assessment can substantially improve management decisions and support sustainable organisational development.